ZHUOJIN-LOGOZhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
Zhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
STEEL PIPE · FITTING · WELDING TECHNICAL STUDY

Cladding of Cobalt-Based Hardfacing Alloy on Pressure Vessel Components

Literature Overview

The paper by You Guangwei and Dong Anxia, published in Pressure Vessel (Vol. 24, Issue 8, 2007, pp. 55-58), describes the practical experience gained in cladding cobalt-based hardfacing alloy (Stellite 6) onto pressure vessel components for coal chemical applications. The work was conducted at the Chemical Machinery Factory of Nanjing Chemical Industry Company, China Petrochemical Corporation, and addresses the manufacturing challenges associated with producing pressure vessels that require both corrosion resistance, pressure containment, and wear resistance.

Core Technical Content

The paper reports on the fabrication of two pressure vessels that required cobalt-based hardfacing cladding in addition to conventional pressure vessel requirements. The key challenges addressed include:

Stellite 6 Properties and Characteristics

Stellite 6 (also known as Cobaltite 6 or UNS R30006) is a cobalt-chromium-tungsten-molybdenum alloy with the following characteristics:

Property Value
Co content Balance (~58%)
Cr content 28-30%
W content 10-12%
Mo content 2.5-3.5%
C content 1.2-1.6%
Hardness (as-cast) 400-500 HV
Hardness (heat treated) 450-550 HV
Maximum service temperature ~1100°C
Corrosion resistance Excellent in oxidizing environments
Wear resistance Excellent at high temperatures

Weldability Challenges of Cobalt-Based Alloys

Cobalt-based hardfacing alloys present several welding challenges:

  1. Cracking susceptibility: The high carbon content and presence of carbide-forming elements (Cr, W, Mo) increase the susceptibility to cracking during solidification and cooling.
  2. High melting temperature: The melting range of Stellite 6 is approximately 1300-1350°C, requiring high heat input.
  3. Poor thermal conductivity: Cobalt-based alloys have low thermal conductivity, leading to high temperature gradients and residual stresses.
  4. Carbide formation: Excessive cooling rates can lead to the formation of brittle intergranular carbides.
  5. Dilution sensitivity: The properties of the overlay are highly sensitive to dilution from the base metal.

Process Development and Welding Parameters

Welding Procedure for Stellite 6 Cladding

Based on the experience described in the paper, the following welding parameters are recommended for Stellite 6 cladding:

Parameter Recommended Range Notes
Welding process TIG or SMAW TIG preferred for thin sections
Current (TIG) 100-200 A DCEN polarity
Current (SMAW) 120-200 A Depends on electrode size
Arc voltage (TIG) 16-22 V Maintains stable arc
Travel speed 40-80 mm/min Slow speed for good fusion
Shielding gas Argon (99.99%) High purity required
Preheat temperature 200-400°C Critical for crack prevention
Interpass temperature 300-400°C Maintain throughout welding
Post-weld heat treatment 850-900°C, 1-2 h Carbide precipitation; stress relief
Layer thickness 2-4 mm per pass Multi-pass for thick overlays

Preheat and Interpass Temperature Control

Preheat is critical for successful Stellite 6 cladding. The recommended preheat temperature of 200-400°C serves several purposes:

  1. Reduces cooling rate: Slower cooling reduces the susceptibility to cracking and minimizes the formation of brittle carbides.
  2. Reduces thermal stress: Lower temperature gradients reduce residual stresses in the weld and base metal.
  3. Promotes carbide dissolution: Higher temperatures promote the dissolution of carbides in the heat-affected zone, improving ductility.

The interpass temperature should be maintained at 300-400°C throughout the welding sequence to ensure consistent thermal conditions for each pass.

Post-Weld Heat Treatment

Post-weld heat treatment is recommended for Stellite 6 cladding to:

The recommended heat treatment is 850-900°C for 1-2 hours followed by air cooling. This temperature range is below the melting point of the cobalt-based alloy but high enough to promote carbide precipitation and stress relief.

Engineering Practice Implications

Application in Coal Chemical Industry

The coal chemical industry presents unique challenges for pressure vessel design:

The combination of Stellite 6 cladding with conventional pressure vessel materials (such as carbon steel or low-alloy steel) provides a cost-effective solution that meets all performance requirements.

Comparison of Hardfacing Materials for Pressure Vessels

Material Hardness (HV) Wear Resistance Corrosion Resistance High-Temp Performance Cost
Stellite 6 (Co-based) 450-550 Excellent Excellent Excellent High
Cr-Cr3C2 cast iron 400-500 Good Moderate Moderate Low
High-carbon martensitic 450-550 Good Poor Poor Low
WC-Co alloy 1200-1500 Very high Poor Moderate Very high
Ni-based alloy 300-400 Moderate Excellent Good High

Quality Control Considerations

For pressure vessel applications, the quality control of Stellite 6 cladding must meet the following requirements:

  1. Non-destructive testing:
  1. Destructive testing (on coupon samples):
  1. Documentation:
  1. Regulatory compliance:

Connection to Pressure Vessel Standards

The cladding of pressure vessels must comply with relevant standards:

Critical Analysis and Reflections

Strengths of the Research

The paper provides valuable practical experience in Stellite 6 cladding for pressure vessel applications, which is often not well-documented in the academic literature. The emphasis on process parameter control and the challenges encountered during production reflects real-world manufacturing conditions.

The application of Stellite 6 to coal chemical pressure vessels is particularly relevant given the growing importance of coal-to-chemicals and coal-to-liquids technologies in China. The wear and corrosion resistance of Stellite 6 is well-suited to the harsh service conditions in these applications.

Limitations and Open Questions

  1. Long-term performance data: The paper does not provide long-term service performance data for the cladded pressure vessels. Field experience over several years would be valuable for validating the design approach.
  2. Thermal cycling effects: The behavior of