ZHUOJIN-LOGOZhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
Zhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
STEEL PIPE · FITTING · WELDING TECHNICAL STUDY

Wear-Resistant Overlay Welding Strategy for Screw Conveyor Blades

Literature Overview

This technical paper by Ma Tiantian and Wang Bingjun from Tangshan Sanyou Chemical Engineering Design Co., Ltd., published in Soda Industry (2018, No. 1, pp. 29-31), presents a practical engineering approach to extending the service life of screw conveyor blades through wear-resistant overlay welding. The study addresses a common industrial problem in chemical processing plants where screw conveyors handle abrasive materials such as soda ash, salts, and granular chemicals.

The research adopts a systematic methodology—analyzing wear patterns, selecting appropriate materials, and implementing overlay welding strategies—to provide actionable guidance for manufacturers and maintenance technicians.

Core Technical Analysis

Wear Pattern Analysis

Screw conveyor blades experience complex wear mechanisms that vary by location and operating conditions:

Wear Zone Wear Mechanism Severity Typical Failure Mode
Blade leading edge Abrasive wear (sliding) High Progressive thinning
Blade trailing edge Abrasive wear (impact) Medium-High Edge chipping
Blade root (hub connection) Fatigue + abrasive Medium Cracking and delamination
Blade surface (upper) Abrasive wear (sliding) Medium Surface roughening
Blade surface (lower) Abrasive + adhesive Low-Medium Material transfer

The wear rate is influenced by material hardness, conveyor speed, material moisture content, and blade geometry. In soda ash handling service, the angular particles of soda ash create severe abrasive wear, with wear rates of 0.5-2.0 mm/year on unprotected carbon steel blades.

Material Selection Strategy

Based on wear analysis, the following material selection approach is recommended:

Application Condition Recommended Overlay Material Hardness (HRC) Expected Life Extension
Mild abrasion (dry powder) Cr-Mo alloy (e.g., D2 equivalent) 55-60 3-5×
Moderate abrasion (granular) High-carbon alloy (e.g., Stellite 6) 45-50 4-6×
Severe abrasion (wet/slurry) Ni-Cr-Mo alloy 40-45 5-8×
Impact + abrasion Martensitic stainless (e.g., 410) 45-52 3-4×

Technical Implementation

Pre-Welding Preparation

The surface preparation procedure is critical for achieving sound overlay welds on existing blades:

  1. Removal of existing wear surface: Machine or grind the worn surface to a uniform thickness, removing all oxide and contaminated material
  2. Surface roughening: Create a mechanical anchor pattern (grooves or dimples) to enhance metallurgical and mechanical bonding
  3. Cleaning: Remove all oil, grease, and particulate contamination using solvent cleaning followed by wire brushing
  4. Fit-up: If blade thickness reduction from wear is significant, consider adding a backing plate before overlay welding

Welding Process Selection

Process Applicability Advantages Limitations
SMAW Field repair; small areas Portable; low equipment cost Lower deposition rate; higher dilution
FCAW Workshop; medium areas High deposition rate; good penetration Requires gas supply
SAW Large flat surfaces Very high deposition rate; consistent quality Requires flat surface; low flexibility
GTA (TIG) Precision areas; root passes Excellent control; low dilution Low deposition rate

For screw conveyor blades, FCAW with flux-cored wire is generally the most practical choice, offering a good balance between deposition rate, flexibility, and equipment requirements.

Process Parameters

Parameter Value Notes
Wire diameter 1.2-1.6 mm Depends on overlay thickness required
Current 200-300 A Adjust for wire diameter
Voltage 28-34 V Maintain stable arc
Travel speed 100-150 mm/min For 3-5 mm overlay thickness
Shielding gas CO₂ or Ar/CO₂ (80/20) For FCAW; pure CO₂ for self-shielded
Preheat 100-150°C For low-alloy steel blades
Interpass temperature ≤ 200°C Prevent overheating and grain coarsening

Quality Control and Acceptance Criteria

Inspection Requirements

Inspection Method Purpose Acceptance Criteria
Visual inspection (VT) Surface defects; undercut No cracks, porosity > 2 mm, undercut > 1 mm
Magnetic particle testing (MT) Surface/subsurface cracks No linear indications > 3 mm
Hardness testing Overlay composition verification Within specified range ± 5 HRC
Bend test (qualification) Ductility verification 180° bend on 10 mm coupon without cracking
Wear testing Performance verification Wear rate < 0.5 mm/year in service

Common Defects and Root Causes

Defect Root Cause Corrective Action
Cracking at root Excessive restraint; high carbon equivalent Increase preheat; reduce travel speed; use low-H electrode
Delamination Poor surface preparation; insufficient penetration Improve cleaning; increase current; add transition layer
Uneven thickness Inconsistent travel speed; operator error Use mechanized welding; implement parameter monitoring
Excessive dilution Low current; high travel speed Increase current; reduce travel speed; use transition pass

Integration with Engineering Practice

Case Study: Soda Ash Conveyor Blade Repair

A typical implementation scenario involves:

Overlay welding solution:

Maintenance Strategy

Implement a preventive maintenance schedule:

  1. Monthly inspection: Visual check of blade edges and surfaces
  2. Quarterly measurement: Ultrasonic thickness measurement at 5-10 critical locations
  3. Annual overlay renewal: Add 1-2 mm of fresh overlay when thickness reaches minimum specification
  4. Complete replacement: When total blade thickness (base + overlay) falls below 6 mm

Study Insights and Implications

This research provides a practical, field-oriented approach to extending screw conveyor blade life through overlay welding. The systematic analysis of wear patterns followed by targeted material selection and process optimization represents a sound engineering methodology that can be applied to similar components across the chemical processing industry.

The key insight is that overlay welding is not merely a surface treatment but a comprehensive engineering solution that requires integration of materials science, welding technology, and operational knowledge. The selection of overlay material must consider not only hardness but also toughness, weldability, and compatibility with the base metal. A hard overlay that cracks or delaminates provides no benefit and may accelerate failure through stress concentration at crack tips.

For engineering practice, the recommended approach is to establish a qualification procedure for each specific application, testing the selected overlay material under actual service conditions before full-scale implementation. This qualification should include wear testing, bend testing, and field trial periods to validate the expected life extension. The economic benefits of overlay welding—reduced replacement frequency, lower downtime, and reduced material consumption—typically justify the initial investment within the first maintenance cycle.