ZHUOJIN-LOGOZhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
Zhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
STEEL PIPE · FITTING · WELDING TECHNICAL STUDY

Overlay Welding Repair Process for Ball Mill Journal Bearings

Literature Overview

This 1994 paper by Wang Zhengjian from Yongchuan Phosphate and Cement Plant, published in "Machinery" (Volume 21, Issue 3, p. 41), documents the development and implementation of an overlay welding repair process for a damaged journal bearing in a cement clinker ball mill. The paper is notable for describing an emergency repair performed without prior precedent, completed in only 4 hours, with subsequent validation through 5 years of successful service.

Background and Emergency Situation

The case involves a clinker ball mill at a phosphate and cement plant that experienced unexpected damage to a journal bearing during operation. The urgency of the situation was compounded by the lack of prior repair precedent for this specific component, requiring rapid development of a suitable repair process.

Ball Mill Operating Conditions

Parameter Typical Value Notes
Mill diameter 2.7–3.6 m Medium to large size
Mill length 4.0–6.0 m Variable
Operating speed 20–30 rpm Low speed, high torque
Bearing load 50–150 tons Extremely heavy loading
Operating temperature 80–120°C Elevated due to grinding heat
Service environment Cement dust, moisture Corrosive and abrasive

Journal Bearing Characteristics

The journal bearing in this application is subjected to:

Overlay Welding Repair Process Development

Given the emergency nature of the repair and the lack of prior precedent, the process development followed a systematic approach:

Step 1: Damage Assessment

The damaged bearing surface was carefully inspected to determine:

Step 2: Repair Strategy Formulation

Based on the damage assessment, the repair strategy was developed:

Step 3: Consumable Selection

The overlay welding consumable was selected based on the following requirements:

Step 4: Process Execution

The actual repair was executed in approximately 4 hours, including:

Step Duration Activity
1 0.5 h Surface preparation and cleaning
2 0.5 h Preheating and temperature control
3 2.0 h Overlay welding (multiple layers)
4 0.5 h Cooling and stress relief
5 0.5 h Post-weld machining and finishing

Step 5: Quality Verification

After the overlay welding repair, the bearing surface was verified through:

Process Parameters

The overlay welding process parameters used for the journal bearing repair were:

Parameter Value Rationale
Welding process SMAW (SMAW) Available equipment, suitable for repair
Electrode type Hard facing electrode Wear resistance requirement
Electrode diameter 4.0 mm Balance of deposit rate and control
Current 140–180 A Adequate penetration, controlled heat input
Arc voltage 24–28 V Stable arc, good deposition
Travel speed 60–80 mm/min Control of heat input and dilution
Number of layers 2–3 layers Achieve required thickness
Layer thickness 3–4 mm Uniform deposition
Preheat temperature 200–250°C Reduce cracking risk
Interpass temperature 200–250°C Maintain ductility

Performance Validation

The overlay welded journal bearing demonstrated excellent performance over a 5-year service period:

  1. Service life — The repaired bearing operated reliably for 5 years, significantly exceeding the expected life of an emergency repair.
  2. Wear characteristics — The overlay layer showed uniform wear without spalling, cracking, or delamination.
  3. Dimensional stability — The bearing maintained its geometric accuracy throughout the service period, indicating good dimensional stability of the overlay layer.
  4. Load capacity — The repaired bearing adequately supported the full operating load of the ball mill without evidence of excessive deformation or failure.
  5. Economic benefit — The 4-hour emergency repair avoided significant production downtime and the cost of bearing replacement, providing substantial economic benefit to the plant.

Engineering Practice Insights

This case study provides several valuable lessons for industrial maintenance welding:

  1. Rapid process development — The ability to develop and implement a suitable repair process in an emergency situation demonstrates the importance of comprehensive welding knowledge and experience.
  2. Systematic approach — Even in an emergency, following a systematic approach to process development (assessment, strategy, execution, verification) ensures a reliable repair.
  3. Quality assurance — The 5-year successful service life validates the importance of proper process execution and quality verification, even for emergency repairs.
  4. Documentation — The detailed documentation of the repair process creates a precedent that can be referenced for future similar repairs, reducing the time required for process development in subsequent emergency situations.
  5. Preventive maintenance implications — The failure of the journal bearing suggests the need for improved monitoring and preventive maintenance procedures to detect bearing degradation before catastrophic failure occurs.

Key Technical Reflections

This paper illustrates the practical application of overlay welding technology in an emergency maintenance scenario. The successful repair of a heavily loaded journal bearing in only 4 hours, with 5 years of subsequent reliable service, demonstrates the versatility and effectiveness of overlay welding as a repair technology.

The technical success of this repair depended on several critical factors:

The economic implications of this repair are substantial. A journal bearing replacement for a large ball mill would require significant downtime, specialized spare parts procurement, and substantial direct costs. The overlay welding repair approach achieved rapid restoration of production at a fraction of the replacement cost, while providing comparable or superior long-term performance.

This case also highlights the importance of maintaining welding expertise and capability within industrial maintenance organizations. The ability to develop and execute a successful repair process under time pressure requires not only technical knowledge but also practical experience and sound engineering judgment. Organizations that invest in developing these capabilities are better positioned to respond effectively to equipment failures and minimize production losses.