ZHUOJIN-LOGOZhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
Zhuojin Pipe Fitting Co., Ltd
STEEL PIPE · FITTING · WELDING TECHNICAL STUDY

Bearing Capacity of Variable Central Angle Round-Ended Steel Tube Concrete Axially Compressed Short Columns

Literature Overview

This research by Ren Zhigang, Wang Gaoyu, and Li Peipeng from Wuhan University of Technology investigates the bearing capacity of round-ended steel tube concrete (SRC) short columns with variable central angles under axial compression. Published in the Journal of Wuhan University of Technology in 2020, the study presents experimental results from four test specimens and proposes a bearing capacity formula based on the double-shear unified strength theory. The research addresses a unique structural configuration where the steel tube cross-section combines flat segments with rounded ends of varying central angles, creating a hybrid cross-section with distinct confinement characteristics.

Core Technical Analysis

Cross-Section Geometry and Confinement Mechanism

The round-ended SRC cross-section consists of:

The confinement mechanism differs between these two regions:

Region Confinement Mechanism Confinement Effectiveness
Flat segment Direct lateral pressure from steel tube walls High confinement due to uniform pressure distribution
Round-end segment Indirect confinement through curved steel tube Lower confinement due to geometric curvature effects
Transition zone Combined effects of flat and round segments Intermediate confinement with potential stress concentrations

The variable central angle of the round-end segments is the key geometric parameter studied. As the central angle increases from 60° to 180°, the proportion of round-end segments increases relative to flat segments, which affects the overall confinement effectiveness and bearing capacity.

Experimental Results and Failure Modes

Specimen Central Angle Aspect Ratio (h/b) Failure Mode Ultimate Bearing Capacity
Specimen 1 60° 1.0 Concrete crushing, steel tube local buckling Baseline value
Specimen 2 120° 1.0 Concrete crushing, steel tube local buckling Higher than baseline
Specimen 3 180° 1.0 Concrete crushing, steel tube local buckling Highest capacity
Specimen 4 Variable 1.0 Concrete crushing, steel tube local buckling Intermediate values

The experimental results reveal that for a rectangular aspect ratio of 1.0 (square cross-section), the bearing capacity increases with increasing central angle. The 180° central angle specimen exhibits the highest bearing capacity, followed by the 120° specimen. However, the 180° specimen demonstrates lower ductility, indicating a trade-off between strength and deformation capacity.

Bearing Capacity Formula Development

The authors develop a bearing capacity formula based on the double-shear unified strength theory and concrete strength zoning. The formula accounts for:

The proposed formula shows good agreement with experimental results for central angles greater than 60°, demonstrating the validity of the theoretical approach for the studied range.

Steel Tube Manufacturing and Material Considerations

Steel Tube Fabrication Requirements

The round-ended SRC cross-section presents unique manufacturing challenges:

Material Property Effects

The study notes that increasing steel strength has a more pronounced effect on the ultimate bearing capacity than increasing concrete strength. This finding has important implications for material selection:

Material Property Effect on Bearing Capacity Effect on Ductility
Steel yield strength Significant increase May reduce ductility
Concrete compressive strength Moderate increase Generally maintains ductility
Steel tube wall thickness Significant increase Increases ductility
Central angle Moderate increase Decreases with increasing angle

Standards and Design Code Context

The design of SRC members is governed by several standards:

Standard Scope Relevance to Round-Ended SRC
GB 50936-2014 SRC structure design code General design provisions
JGJ/T 138-2019 Technical specification for SRC SRC member design requirements
GB 50011-2010 Seismic design code Seismic performance requirements
EC4 (Eurocode 4) Design of composite structures International comparison basis
AISI SRM Steel tube concrete design American practice reference

The round-ended SRC cross-section is not explicitly covered in existing design codes, which primarily address circular and rectangular SRC members. The proposed bearing capacity formula fills this gap for the specific geometry studied, but further research is needed to extend the applicability to other cross-section configurations and loading conditions.

Engineering Practice Integration

Practical Applications

Round-ended SRC columns offer potential advantages in specific applications:

Design Recommendations

Based on the research findings, the following design recommendations are proposed:

  1. For maximum bearing capacity, a central angle of 180° is preferred, but ductility requirements may limit the practical application
  2. A central angle of 120° provides a good balance between bearing capacity and ductility
  3. Central angles less than 60° should be avoided, as the bearing capacity formula shows poor agreement with experimental results in this range
  4. Steel strength should be prioritized over concrete strength for maximizing bearing capacity
  5. The cross-section aspect ratio should be maintained near 1.0 for optimal performance

Key Questions and Reflections

The transition from short column to long column behavior requires additional research. The slenderness effects may interact with the variable confinement characteristics of the round-ended cross-section in complex ways that are not captured by the current bearing capacity formula.

Study Insights and Implications

This research makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of SRC member behavior with non-conventional cross-section geometries. The development of a bearing capacity formula based on the double-shear unified strength theory provides a theoretical foundation for the design of round-ended SRC columns.

For steel pipe and SRC engineers, the key insight is that cross-section geometry significantly influences the confinement effectiveness and bearing capacity of SRC members. The variable central angle parameter offers a design degree of freedom that can be exploited to optimize the strength-ductility balance. The finding that steel strength has a more pronounced effect on bearing capacity than concrete strength reinforces the importance of steel material selection in SRC design.

Future research should extend to eccentric loading, long column behavior, cyclic loading for seismic applications, and the development of simplified design equations suitable for practical engineering use. The integration of round-ended SRC technology with advanced steel pipe manufacturing processes, such as cold forming and hot rolling, could enable widespread adoption of this innovative cross-section geometry in structural applications. The proposed bearing capacity formula provides a solid starting point for design code development, and further experimental and analytical research will refine and extend its applicability.